JavaScript libraries worldwide: market share ranking

Libraries loaded on the homepage.

#	Technology	Global	United Kingdom	Netherlands	Italy	Spain	Japan	Latin America
1	jQuery	35%	42%	35%	47%	46%	63%	47%
2	Swiper	12%	12%	14%	19%	17%	21%	19%
3	core-js	11%	17%	17%	23%	18%	11%	22%
4	jQuery Migrate	9.7%	16%	13%	21%	17%	12%	20%
5	Slick	5.1%	6.7%	3.9%	7.4%	8%	24%	9.5%
6	jQuery UI	3.3%	4.5%	3.3%	7.5%	8.2%	5.2%	4.4%
7	Owl Carousel	3.2%	4.5%	3.1%	7.7%	7%	1.2%	8.1%
8	Modernizr	2.7%	4.8%	2.8%	5.2%	4.2%	3.1%	3.8%
9	webpack	2.4%	3.8%	1.8%	1.3%	1.7%	0.8%	2.2%
10	Vite	2%	0.8%	0.9%	0.7%	0.8%	0.6%	2%
11	lazysizes	1.9%	2.4%	1.7%	3.2%	2.4%	4%	3.8%
12	GSAP	1.8%	1.4%	1.1%	1.9%	1.4%	2.6%	1.5%
13	Alpine.js	1.5%	3.1%	4.9%	2.3%	1.4%	0.4%	1.1%
14	Lottie	0.9%	0.7%	0.5%	1%	1.9%	0.4%	0.7%
15	RequireJS	0.6%	2.1%	1.8%	1.4%	1.1%	0.2%	1.3%
16	Hotwire (Turbo / Stimulus)	0.5%	0.4%	0.7%	0.6%	0.6%	0.2%	0.5%
17	Lodash	0.4%	0.4%	0.2%	0.6%	0.4%	0.4%	0.7%
18	htmx	0.2%	0.3%	0.4%	0.2%	<0.1%	<0.1%	0.2%
19	three.js	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	0.2%	<0.1%
20	Polyfill.io (compromised CDN)	<0.1%	0.2%	0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%

By site popularity

Share of measured sites in each Tranco popularity band that use the technology: the top 1,000, 10,000 and 100,000 sites and the whole top million.

#	Technology	Top 1K	Top 10K	Top 100K
1	jQuery	17%	25%	35%
2	Swiper	8.1%	11%	12%
3	core-js	5.6%	7.3%	11%
4	jQuery Migrate	2.7%	5.7%	9.7%
5	Slick	1.9%	3.8%	5.1%
6	webpack	4.9%	3%	2.4%
7	jQuery UI	1.4%	2.1%	3.3%
8	GSAP	2%	2%	1.8%
9	Modernizr	1.2%	1.8%	2.7%
10	Owl Carousel	0.8%	1.6%	3.2%
11	lazysizes	0.5%	1.6%	1.9%
12	Vite	1.2%	1.5%	2%
13	Alpine.js	1.2%	1.5%	1.5%
14	Lottie	0.7%	1.1%	0.9%
15	Hotwire (Turbo / Stimulus)	0.3%	0.6%	0.5%
16	RequireJS	0.8%	0.6%	0.6%
17	Lodash	0.3%	0.5%	0.4%
18	htmx	0%	0.2%	0.2%
19	three.js	0%	<0.1%	<0.1%
20	Polyfill.io (compromised CDN)	0.2%	<0.1%	<0.1%
	Sites measured	591	6,700	68,769

Our crawler: 68,769 sites · Global · updated Oct 23, 2026 · Methodology